Supreme Court Showdown: Akpabio Takes Legal War Against Senator Natasha to Nigeria’s Highest Court


​-By Ruben Mario Brodrick 

The high-stakes legal battle between Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central, has reached its final frontier as the dispute moves to the apex court of the land. Despite recent indications that Akpabio intended to withdraw pending litigations against his political adversaries, he has formally approached the Supreme Court to sustain an appeal challenging the decisions of lower courts that previously favored the Kogi Senator. Filed under motion SC NO: SC/CV/1111/2025, the Senate President is seeking to regularize his appeal and obtain a stay against the rulings that branded the Senate's disciplinary actions as a violation of constitutional rights.

​The roots of this intense friction trace back to a volatile plenary session in February 2025. During that sitting, Senator Natasha raised concerns regarding procedural breaches and issues of privilege, which eventually escalated into a protest following the reassignment of her seat by the Senate leadership. This defiance led to her matter being referred to the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions, headed by Senator Neda Imasuen. Based on the committee’s recommendations, she was slapped with a six-month suspension, and her official legislative office was sealed on March 6, 2025.

​The legal pendulum swung in Natasha’s favor on July 4, 2025, when the Federal High Court in Abuja delivered a scathing judgment. The court faulted the Senate's disciplinary process, describing the suspension as "excessive and unconstitutional" while highlighting a failure to provide the lawmaker with a fair hearing. However, Akpabio’s current push to the Supreme Court argues that the judiciary is overstepping. He maintains that under Section 60 of the 1999 Constitution, the National Assembly possesses the sovereign power to regulate its own internal procedures and that the Senate President is not obligated to rule immediately on every point of privilege raised during a heated session.

​Even though Senator Natasha successfully resumed her legislative duties on September 23, 2025, after her suspension lapsed and her office was unsealed, the legal war refuses to die down. The case is further complicated by a secondary legal row involving a social media post made by the Senator during the heat of the litigation, which resulted in a court fine and an order for a public apology—a decision she is currently contesting. As the Supreme Court prepares to deliberate, the outcome is expected to be a landmark ruling that will finally clarify the boundaries of legislative immunity and determine whether the judiciary has the right to intervene in the internal disciplinary mechanisms of the National Assembly.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Breaking: Agbor Catholic Community Mourns as Fr. Chukwuma Collapses, Dies on the Pulpit During New Year Mass

Archbishop Akubeze Announces the Passing of Fr. Jude Ezenwa

Why Pope Francis died -Pastor Chris Oyakhilome